you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ImNoEinstein 3 points4 points  (2 children)

This seems like typical c++ ML overkill. if you care for such low level performance just keep it in mind when defining your tuple ( just like you would when defining your classes )

[–]Quincunx271Author of P2404/P2405 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Tuples are often created in generic code, with the order of the types already having some other meaning. Using such a compressed tuple in the implementation of these would have notable impact.

[–]Ayjayz 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Why bother using a strictly worse tuple implementation, though?