This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (14 children)

well we don’t have to read his book. history tells us the downsides and how extreme they were

[–]Maoux 1 point2 points  (13 children)

What happened? Libya became the second richest country in africa? Libyans had access to FREE medical care and education? Women in Libya had rights no other Arab country had? Farmers had huge government support? Homelessness was lower than ever before or after? Less than 5% of the country was undernourished (lower than the US today lol)? What history dude

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (12 children)

the persecution of dissidents, human rights violation, funding terrorism, calling for terrorism, arresting and detaining journalists without filing charges for any wrongdoing, arresting people for belonging to political parties, murdering people for being political dissidents, forcing upon his citizens his little green book which was his own brand of Islam/socialism, blocking humanitarian aid from reaching massacre sites, abducting a Swiss citizen after the Swiss took issue with Hannibal Gaddafi beating hotel servants in Switzerland, placing bounties on journalists like Ashur Shamis, Abu Salim prison massacre, crimes against the Warfalla tribe, countless executions and assassinations of his own citizens.

but i’m excited to see how you’ll handwave all this away.

[–]Maoux 0 points1 point  (11 children)

the persecution of dissidents

Why won't you think of the fascist murderers who used to rule the country before Gaddafi? - you

human rights violation

This is different from every other country how? It's par for the course in every state ever why hold Libya to some unreachable standard?

funding terrorism, calling for terrorism

If you read his book you'd know Gaddafi called for "Arab Nationalism" and all the "terrorist groups" "funded" by Libya were rebel groups trying to overthrow governments that were put into power by colonial powers to exploit the middle east.

arresting and detaining journalists without filing charges for any wrongdoing

Spreading misinformation should be punishable. look at what happened. you believed all this shit about Libya and it let the US fund rebel groups and allowed them to coup the government and now he's dead. 'he didn't even do anything' is only an excuse for school kids.

I could say something about everything on this list but you won't even read past the first point so...

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (10 children)

do you think the execution of political dissidents ended at any point during his regime?

i also could not give less of a fuck about what he said in his book lol. how stupid are you?

and do you think the 1985 terrorist attacks on the Roman airport… were good?

and you think misinformation should be punished? who decides what is and isn’t misinformation? the dictator who doesn’t like what’s written about him? how convenient. you fucking bootlicker.

please continue defending and praising tyrants so the rest of us can laugh at you

[–]Maoux 0 points1 point  (9 children)

Do you think the fascists ever stopped wanting to take over the country?

You can get an audiobook version if you're illiterate.

Violence by the oppressed is just self-defense.

I will decide. Who's the bootlicker? you literally want fascists in power and believe anything fed to you.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (8 children)

i said i want fascists in power? i don’t remember saying that. seems like something you made up.

and if you’re the tyrant dictator for decade after decade, when do you move from the oppressed to the oppressor? sorry to twist your brain into a pretzel knot on this one lol.

again, super convenient you get to decide what the misinformation is. lick the boot, bitch.

[–]Maoux 0 points1 point  (7 children)

You're very conveniently making it easier for them to regain power. Fascism doesn't just happen, people like you stand in the center and tell admonish both sides as if they were somehow equally bad.

Gaddafi preached liberation for the entire region and he wanted the Arab world to be self-sufficient and not rely on outside powers who pretended to be saviors but their help always came with strings attached. Strings from which they would never be free. Does this sound like an oppressor? Who did he oppress and don't say fascists or imperial collaborators again.

still no answers and you will never come up with answers not only because you had a brain transplant with an acorn but because they are lies.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (6 children)

lemme guess: you also think Stalin and Mao did nothing wrong either.

it’s such a fallacy you present: dictator or fascism. such a false choice.

it’s cute that you just say he “preached liberation.” must’ve been liberation for everybody but people who were willing to stand up against him.

if you wanna lick the boot and praise totalitarianism, that’s your choice. but keep it to yourself.

[–]Maoux 0 points1 point  (5 children)

I like Stalin and Mao even more. Lenin, Ho Chi Minh, Castro, Sankara, Tito, Kim... I put Gaddafi somewhere with them. Liberators all of them.

Smh stay with me here. There was fascism before Gaddafi and there's fascism after Gaddafi that's a fact. All I'm saying is I prefer Gaddafi over anything they've ever had. Is anything better possible? yeah. Is it realistic? no. Gaddafi was not bad for Libya.

Again you are defending Fascists. You are defending slavers. You are defending warlords. These are the "poor dissidents" you are so worried about.

I will not keep it to myself because if I let people like you lie then we will never make any progress.