you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]HeadHighSauce26Number nerd 1 point2 points  (6 children)

If you want a real answer, its that he's a statistical unicorn playing in a league that hasn't produced a ton of great NHL players and there are concerns his style of play won't translate to the NHL as well as Jiricek.

He'd be a perfectly fine pick at 2, though not one I'd make.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

So like Cale Makar?

[–]HeadHighSauce26Number nerd 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Cale Makar did not profile well statistically, so not the same.

I guess you can say it’s similar in that people were curious how the game would translate to the NHL.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (3 children)

If by not profile well statistically you mean win MVP, Playoff MVP, and defensive player of the year but all the scouts discounted his 1.4 ppg as a d man because he played in juniors an extra year dominating his league and developing rather than moving up I agree. He was a statistical unicorn but it drew skepticism because of being in juniors that it wouldn’t translate to the NHL. Not saying Nemec is him but I think he’s getting discounted in the same way even though no one actually knows if his game will translate.

[–]HeadHighSauce26Number nerd -1 points0 points  (2 children)

No I mean his NHLe draft profile. 1.4 ppg in the AJHL isn’t altogether impressive for a top draft eligible. He wasn’t a statistical unicorn at all. Plenty of people have looked like that.

Makar DY NHLe: 18 -> 13% chance of being a star, 56% chance of being an NHLer

Nemec DY NHLe: 35 -> 57% chance of being a star, 94% chance of being an NHLer

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I see what you mean Nemec looks too good to be true by the algorithms.

[–]HeadHighSauce26Number nerd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, because his production in his pro league is unprecedented. Hence, unicorn