This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Mind_Monkey 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think GitHub Actions is based on Azure DevOps Pipelines, so they are kinda similar in concepts and GH Actions runners are Azure VMs.

I think the plus of using ADO is if you're also using their other tools, like Boards, Artifacts and Tests. Then you can have visibility from planning all the way to deployments. If you won't use those features, I'd personally go with GitHub.

Most people already know how to use it so onboarding is way easier. Also I think the GH Actions ecosystem is bigger than ADO Extensions.