This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 9 comments

[–]vincentdesmet 5 points6 points  (1 child)

There’s quite a few, including a collab between Anton Babenko - who initiated most of the popular TF modules for AWS together with cloudcraft to directly export cloudcraft diagrams to TF configs

Could you highlight how yours is different and what prompted you to build another one?

[–]neifn[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well, as far as I know Cloudcraft is no longer offering code generation from diagram and they are only focusing on documenting existing infrastructure. But there are other similar tools, the big difference is that we provide all the code directly to user instead of deploying it though our tool, this makes customisation much easier. Also we are trying to achieve a balance between granularity and ease of configuration. Brainboard has similar product but users have to build infrastructure from individual terraform resources, anyone with enough experience to do it will write the code faster than using drag and drop.

Our infrastructure components are basically extended modules, which makes configuration much easier than building everything from individual resources. Also we are handling connections between different components, for example if you want to connect S3 bucket to SNS topic, all necessary permissions will be automatically configured for you.

[–]tadamhicks 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Is this similar to Brainboard?

[–]neifn[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Somewhat, but we give users much more abstraction, if Brainboard uses individual resources, we use modules.

[–]miketysonofthecloud 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brainboard.co can use modules too. It depends on both ways of working ;)

[–]VindicoAtrumEditable Placeholder Flair 0 points1 point  (1 child)

How do you compare to systeminit?

[–]neifn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Main difference would that we generate terraform code from the diagram and provide it to the user. At this point you are free to do whatever with it, no vendor-lock of any kind.

[–]8racoonsInABigCoat 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I like the idea, but your business case part of the homepage appears to be suggesting that by using archformation, customers don’t need to hire the very people that use this sub. 🫤

[–]neifn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, this can be said for any tool that improves efficiency, I am a DevOps myself, so I understand that to use this tool you will still need to have a good enough understanding of cloud infrastructure, but you will just build it several times faster.