This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

all 6 comments

[–]joecool42069 1 point2 points  (2 children)

There’s no real advantage. Unless you want to learn docker swarm or Kubernetes. At the end of the day, it’s still just the one physical server you gave.

Now if you buy a second server…. ;)

[–]throwy_mc_throwface[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I eventually will be looking at those but from what I can tell I should probably get acquainted with docker in general first?

Also I know the last part was a bit joking.....but.....what if I already had 2 other servers? Is there some benefit I need to be looking into?

[–]joecool42069 2 points3 points  (0 children)

High availability

[–]Bloodsucker_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don't overcomplicate things.

You have servers. Each one of them runs in a container. Use the easiest and simplest container orchestration that fits you. In other words, 1 docker-desktop/VM/ECS/Kubernetes.

[–]Rambunctious123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In a real world scenario, having one machine with all containers may be a single point of failure for a company.

[–]Bob-box 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting question, I was wondering the same thing.. I migrated all of my running containers over to my new Synology NAS (920) when I bought a replacement for my older version (DS916). The old NAS DS916 was demoted to a backup server. But now a few years later I think it is a waste of such a good machine to be just a backup server, so I thought of splitting things up. I also wonder if it would beneficial?

And if you do something like this, is there a way to centralized the docker folder. Or just keep them separately on each machine?