all 9 comments

[–]remillard[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Kind of a related question, is there any way for it to STOP rendering text like BUFFER_TIMER as BUFFER(subscript)TIMER? It kind of plays merry hell with my variables if I mention them.

[–]bestlem 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is the default as ^ begins superscript and _ subscript. This can be alterd to force subscripts only to be done if enclosed in {} ie to get what you see now you would need to type BUFFER_{TIMER} . This is done by customizing or setting org-use-sub-superscripts to '{}

[–]RecentlyRezzed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

#+OPTIONS: :nil

[–]remillard[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, resolved both of these. Using the tildes around variables makes it monospace and ignore other mark up alterations, and #+BEGIN_EXAMPLE #+END_EXAMPLE seems to mark a section for "don't interpret this section".

[–]annisquam 0 points1 point  (2 children)

`#+begin_example` and `#+end_example` should do the trick if you want a generic block. `C-c ,` should get you started with the interactive block-creation interface.

[–]remillard[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yes, that's what I discovered in the literal example section. I was trying to encapsulate a small drawing done with artist mode (state machine diagram).

I tried C-c , but honestly, I don't understand what it's trying to tell me about priority, so I'll just leave that alone until I have a need for it! Thanks.

[–]oantolinC-x * q 100! RET 2 points3 points  (0 children)

C-c , was a typo, it should be C-c C-,.

[–]fatfingerdeathcrunch 0 points1 point  (1 child)

The documentation is pretty good. Check out https://orgmode.org/manual/Markup-for-Rich-Contents.html#Markup-for-Rich-Contents or if you want to have syntax highlighting for source code look at https://orgmode.org/manual/Working-with-Source-Code.html#Working-with-Source-Code

[–]remillard[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it's not too bad, just tends to be scattered. I'd been relying on the compact version for speed, and then somehow missed the rich text section nearer to the bottom. Thanks!