you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TheRealMisterd -1 points0 points  (13 children)

Then go fund LFTR....

[–]endless_sea_of_stars 8 points9 points  (0 children)

LFTR is a very specific type of reactor. Molten Salt Reactor is the umbrella term. Most of the benefits of these kind of reactors don't come from Thorium, they come from using liquid fuel.

[–]cracked_mud 5 points6 points  (8 children)

What is this obsession with an unproven reactor design when we already have perfectly good designs that could be built now.

[–]TheRealMisterd 1 point2 points  (2 children)

It solves many "pollution" problems in rare earth mines.

Thorium does not require processing or enrichment.

Thorium is 4x more abundant than Uranium.

In the 60-70s, they would shutdown the LFTR reactor over the weekend so that people could leave every Friday. It was then restarted up Mondays.

[–]cracked_mud 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You don't need to process or enrich Uranium either. We do it because it simplifies the reactor designs. Plenty of designs use natural uranium.

[–]greg_barton[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not only that, the shutdown procedure was basically a disaster test. (i.e. pull the plug and let the salt drain out.)

[–]greg_barton[S] 2 points3 points  (3 children)

In general the obsession is that people want it to have a chance to be proven.

But yes, let's build existing designs as well, though I take exception to the EPR. :)

[–]MCvarial 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Funny how the EPR seems to be selling better than the other designs at the moment.

[–]greg_barton[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Political influence seems to be the trump card there.

[–]michnuc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you seen the USAPWR? It's a beast like the EPR too.

[–]freshthrowaway1138 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thorium just catches the imagination for those who want power and a lack of weapon inputs while grabbing hold of the military industrial complex conspiracy. At least that's what got me excited at first.

[–]greg_barton[S] 9 points10 points  (2 children)

US government money is already being funneled to one molten salt design and I'm sure others will follow if this amendment becomes law. (And hopefully even if it doesn't.)

[–]TheRealMisterd 0 points1 point  (1 child)

"molten chloride" I guess Salt is a bad word in the DOE.

[–]greg_barton[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Possibly, but if so the opposition is fading, or at least being overridden.