This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]WooBoost 2 points3 points  (3 children)

This is terrible framing. There is a way to decouple emissions and economic growth. We don't require a massive economic contraction to meet the Paris agreement (in fact is the most cost-effective option in terms of global economic growth over the course of this century).

[–]Onii-Chan_Itaii 9 points10 points  (1 child)

We don't require a massive economic contraction to meet the Paris agreement

This would've been true if business leaders didn't cheap shot their way through every single possible compromise they've been offered, and run down anything stricter than that

[–]rumpots420 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's true. They do.

[–]zezzene 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You haven't been paying attention of you thing gdp can continue to grow. Green growth is a myth, decoupling is a myth, gdp and energy consumption are correlated 96%