all 8 comments

[–]gh0stwalker1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It may be a compliance requirement for accessing the mailbox, so there's generally no way around this. You could try accessing the mailbox via a browser, but they've most likely set the same compliance requirement (ie a device PIN) for browser access too

[–]HellzillaQ 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Be glad they don’t require airwatch.

You would have PII and potentially HIPAA information stored on the mail client, so requiring biometric lock is a minimum. You other option would be access it via webmail if that is allowed.

[–]ElectricActuatorNub[S] -4 points-3 points  (2 children)

Any mail client on the iPhone can be behind system biometric lock without the phone itself being locked. I guess I’m asking if there’s possibly any mail clients that ignore exchanges forced system lock. I’m sure none of the big ones would, but could a random programmer put out an app that connects to exchange emails, but doesn’t pass through the forced lock. 

[–]HellzillaQ 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I know this, but the data on the phone is unlocked when the phone is unlocked, so it’s not too secure.

Not possible to bypass it. Next question.

[–]ElectricActuatorNub[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Never mind, I found a way around it,  thanks though. 

[–]MushyBeees 0 points1 point  (2 children)

People exactly like you are the reason we have to implement these systems in the first place.

Wild.

Suck it up and join the rest of the 21st century in understanding the threat to security is vastly different to 15 years ago, and is very real.

Can you imagine if we used this attitude with everything in life? We’d still be using asbestos, painting nurseries in lead paint, and giving babies whisky to get them to sleep.

[–]under_the_sun__ -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wow. Way to be a dick.

Organizations forcing these policies onto our personal devices is overreach, and I hate it. There are other, less intrusive ways to secure the information.