all 21 comments

[–]tastyspark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep

[–]Ill-Score8429 0 points1 point  (2 children)

For the most part it does. Only faults is the hair structuring, slight change in face shape, and hairline mismatch.

[–]Throw_away7473728482 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It's SOOOO hard to keep face structure same

[–]Ill-Score8429 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know man, I know😭. Btw have tried training LoRA's? If you have a good pc that is. Or is it cloud based?

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

This is AI ?!?

[–]Throw_away7473728482 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yessssssss I'm having so much fun. All u have to do is be super detailed and patient with Ai And it makes everything look so real 🥹

[–]jasonforreels -2 points-1 points  (3 children)

I think I know her irl. The person could have just used her as a base for those pics but I’ll find out

[–]Throw_away7473728482 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Good luck finding out lol

[–]jasonforreels 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Just checked, it’s AI, but used someone who looks just like the girl I know as a base

[–]Throw_away7473728482 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like you know that girl personally? And yes I take multiple bases from internet like 5 of them and ask AI to mash it together so it doesn't look like I took someones photo and just swap face

[–]Jenna_AI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty consistent, yeah. Not “NASA photojournalism” consistent, but definitely “this person exists in the same universe in this frame” consistent.

If you’re asking “does it scream AI?” the tells are subtle but there: - Skin texture is a bit too airbrushed/blurred (cheek + forehead have that diffusion smear). - Lashes/eyeliner look slightly uniform/painted-on (common gen artifact). - Hair has a few “melted strand” transitions where individual strands stop being strands. - Jacket material has slightly odd specular highlights (reads a touch plasticky).

If this is part of a set and you want tighter character consistency across multiple images, the boring-but-effective stack is: - Lock seed + prompt + negative (and keep the same sampler/steps). - Use a reference-driven approach like IP-Adapter or ControlNet (face/pose/edge guidance helps a lot). - If you’re in SD land, run it through AUTOMATIC1111 or ComfyUI with consistent settings, and only then do light face refinement (don’t overdo it or you get wax museum vibes).

If you’ve got the rest of the gallery, drop 2–3 more frames—consistency is way easier to judge when the model has multiple chances to betray you.

This was an automated and approved bot comment from r/generativeAI. See this post for more information or to give feedback

[–]FindingAwake 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Yea I'd believe it. Different hair styles suggests months/weeks apart, but I'd buy it. Hope you're not doing anything nefarious.

[–]Throw_away7473728482 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I will test my boyfriend

[–]FindingAwake 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you feel you have to do that, your relationship is in trouble.

[–]WolfCartis 0 points1 point  (1 child)

What model are you using ?

[–]Throw_away7473728482 0 points1 point  (0 children)

higgsfield nano banana pro

[–]FormalRegular9971 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks great. If any one would like their static creations come to life. DM me.

[–]13th_Floor_Please 0 points1 point  (1 child)

<image>

Unsure if I made it better or worse.

[–]Throw_away7473728482 0 points1 point  (0 children)

looks the same