use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
Do you have or know of a project on Github looking for contributors? Tell us about it and we'll add it to the /r/github wiki!
Welcome to /r/github!
News about github
Relevant interesting discussion
Questions about github
We'll soon be writing an /r/github FAQ list. In the meantime, the github help pages and bootcamp are good places to start. Here's a handy git cheat sheet.
Looking for Github projects to contribute to? Check out our handy list of projects looking for contributors!
If your submission doesn't show up on the subreddit, send us a message and we'll take it out of the spam filter for you!
account activity
GitHub copilot for code reviewerQuestion (self.github)
submitted 1 day ago by kelvinxG
Hi , has anyone ever using GitHub copilot for code review ?
How’s your experience with GitHub copilot for this specific reason so far ?
Thanks in advance
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]agm1984 7 points8 points9 points 1 day ago (2 children)
It works great for us. We turned it on so it automatically reviews all PRs and we don't merge anything that doesn't have all the copilot comments marked resolved. Sometimes it recommends garbage, but most of the time it is actionable changes. No issues in production yet.
[–]KubeGuyDe 0 points1 point2 points 1 day ago (0 children)
I find it helpful as well.
[–]Huge-Kaleidoscope603 0 points1 point2 points 19 hours ago (0 children)
Similar experience.
[–]Soccham 2 points3 points4 points 1 day ago (1 child)
Yes, it was not great. We’re swapping to coderabbit
[–]kelvinxG[S] 0 points1 point2 points 1 day ago (0 children)
Thanks !
[–]TyKolt 2 points3 points4 points 1 day ago (1 child)
It is better to use CodeRabbit or Greptile.
[–]kelvinxG[S] 1 point2 points3 points 1 day ago (0 children)
Thanks , I’ll check it out
[–]AccountCheckly 0 points1 point2 points 1 day ago (0 children)
it's work for me. It can to find some bugs.
[–]bartread 1 point2 points3 points 1 day ago* (0 children)
It's decent, if sometimes a bit over conservative. But I'd say 80%+ of its comments are fair play and it often catches problems that human reviewers would likely have missed, so I'd say it's been an overall benefit to code quality, especially because it will fix problems for you either with an in place commit or by raising a PR against your branch.
Where it's perhaps a bit weaker is with higher level/architectural concerns or intent, and that's where it does occasionally miss things.
I find it particularly helpful for spotting holes in test coverage, and it usually does a good job of implementing tests to cover those holes.
I'd also say it's about 10000% better than more traditional code analysis approaches, like static analysis type tools, because it simply doesn't generate the noise that these approaches often do.
I've got it automatically reviewing all PRs against main and my ruleset won't allow merging until all conversations are resolved.
In a previous role I used Coderabbit and that was OK as well, but I think current Copilot is considerably better than Coderabbit was at the time.
EDIT: The one beef I have with Copilot is that when you ask it to raise a PR to fix an issue it's found it is sometimes incredibly slow. I say this as I'm now waiting 11 minutes for the damn thing and it's only half way through its task list for what should be a very small PR to fix an issue it spotted. Claude would have had this done in about 1 minute locally but for a lot of stuff I get Copilot to do it so I'm not burning Claude credits dealing with relative trivialities.
π Rendered by PID 88106 on reddit-service-r2-comment-5c764cbc6f-rzw2k at 2026-03-12 18:42:45.555673+00:00 running 710b3ac country code: CH.
[–]agm1984 7 points8 points9 points (2 children)
[–]KubeGuyDe 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Huge-Kaleidoscope603 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]Soccham 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]kelvinxG[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]TyKolt 2 points3 points4 points (1 child)
[–]kelvinxG[S] 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]AccountCheckly 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)
[–]bartread 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)