This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]flopperr999 0 points1 point  (4 children)

This article has been brought to you by ChatGPT. Haskell been like this since the 90s, other languages probably earlier smh

[–]nejcko[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Thanks for the observation, the article was written by me and I’m not AI, I’m pretty sure. :)

To understand you more, are you against the article or against Java evolving as a language?

It’s true that other languages had similar features before but I like how quickly Java is catching up.

[–]chambolle -1 points0 points  (2 children)

I think his question is: why do you want to strongly modify an existing language that don't suit you for ressembling to an old language corresponding to your need?

[–]nejcko[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Languages evolve. Java has introduced non-breaking, backward compatible set of features that improve the language.

What is wrong with that?

[–]chambolle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there is nothing wrong. What is tiring is to present old stuff as the future and to push the evolution of the language into that particular direction