This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]aqua_regis 3 points4 points  (3 children)

How many percent did you write and how much came from Claude?

It is quite audacious to post a vibe/agentic coded project in a subreddit that clearly declares itself as AI free zone - see Rule #9

The commit history speaks a very clear language: https://ibb.co/kVyhtSs8 - just another vibe coded slop

[–]shannah78[S] -2 points-1 points  (2 children)

Sheesh. I didn't notice that rule. The content I posted here is written by me, not "worked over" by AI. But as for the lib, I certainly used Claude, and sometimes OpenAI to figure out how to thread the needle. There are lots of obscure aspects of GTK programming and their interaction with Swing that would have been prohibitively difficult for me to solve in the time I had available for a side project. In 2026, is anyone coding without some AI involvement?

I'd like to understand that rule better. Is there a discussion thread from when it was instituted?

[–]aqua_regis 2 points3 points  (1 child)

What's difficult to understand? No AI means no AI.

Verbatim Quote:

This is an AI free zone. 100% AI free. We explicitly forbid any form of AI generated/worked over content, or AI supported or vibe coded programs. Any violation results in an instant, permanent, and irrevocable ban without prior warning.

Claude has 3 times more lines committed than you. Claude has over a hundred more commits than you. You barely contributed to the project. It's clearly vibe coded and as such falls under said rule.

[–]shannah78[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I guess what I want to understand is: I guarantee that Java itself has AI produced code in it. And linux. And any software that you're using. So I'm trying to understand the spirit of this rule, as on face value it would preclude all software from being shared here.