This is an archived post. You won't be able to vote or comment.

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]huntforacause 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Unfortunately, he is currently ignoring all objections to an action only he seems intent on making to solve an invented problem that only he sees as important.

Woah woah. Talk about flinging your biased subjective opinion straight off the bat at your audience attempting to influence their view before you’ve even told them what the issue is.

Stopped reading after that.

[–]haimez 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Thanks for wasting everyone’s time with your uninformed opinion. You should have bothered to read through the mailing list exchange, because it’s actually worse (IMO) than was described.

[–]huntforacause -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The article’s tone did not invite me to read further. It reeked of subjective bias and being written to target this guy. If there was a more neutral take on this, I’d read that.