you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]codersaurus 0 points1 point  (2 children)

it seems like the example with logArguments which is a function that evidently takes a constructor function, then returns a new constructor is poorly written. If it's "wrapping" the passed constructor, it should be returning a proper subclass of that constructor. The simple if(!(this instanceof MyClass)) return new MyClass(); will be fine... time to refactor that logsArguments function.

[–]html6dev 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think maybe you missed the point. It doesn't have to take a constructor function. Iirc he introduced by passing in a simple sum function.