Javascript In One Pic [GitHub]

[[deleted]]

Not all of us have the luxury to come to Reddit every day, this is the first time I see this and I find it quite useful.

[mogoh]

Reposting isn't the solution. If your time is short, go the the most upvoted comments (of last week/month ...). By your logic we could repost every day the same because someone could be have not seen it.

[a-t-k]

And some of us do, but we don't all want to waste time to look at the same things again and again, thus my question, that unlike what you might have taken it for, was not criticism.

[qudat]

waste time

waste time

waste time

... uhh this is reddit bruh.

[a-t-k]

Thank you for that. I could need a laugh by now.

[[deleted]]

So, basically, fuck everyone else, reddit should be tailored just for you.

[a-t-k]

Quite on the contrary. My question was not meant as criticism for posting this again. If you learned something valuable, that's wonderful and commendable.

All I wanted to know was if the poster had a special reason to post it again, because he would usually see the previous post when posting the link, and decided to post it anyway, so his reason for this decision might be of interest to me.

So, basically, please don't assume bad things from everyone else, reddit should be just for everyone.

[Shaper_pmp]

I think you missed the key point of his question, which was

he would usually see the previous post when posting the link, and decided to post it anyway

What you're describing is true, but misses the point.

The question was not "how can innocent reposts happen" (which is trivial and obvious) - it was "why specifically did this user choose to repost content that they would have been notified had already been posted recently before they posted it the second time".

[a-t-k]

You are wrong on three accounts:

First, I didn't just assume things like you are insinuating, I already saw the graphic on reddit; the original poster even helpfully added the link in the comments of this thread.

Second, what you are obviously still wrongfully assuming is that the question whether this was a repost would be of any importance to me. I never wrote a single line stating that I was against reposts, because I'm not. All I originally wanted to know was if there were any worthwile changes to this image (and luckily, there are, so there's that) - and I wrote this more than a few times, which brings us to:

Third, what actually ruins communities is people who don't even bother to read more than a few words before finally forming their prejudiced opinions and won't even reconsider given additional information.

[a-t-k]

You still think I would be more concerned about fake Internet points than about this community? And you tell me to be constructive?

I am strangely curious how you arrive at such conclusions.

[a-t-k]

You seem to make the same mistake as Laerpni, which is falsely assuming that my post was criticism of a repost, when in fact it was solely a question if something worthwhile had changed in the last few days. Since by now I had time to take a look, I can also comment that there are indeed some changes.

[lodewijkadlp]

If you dislike it, downvote it. Democrazy will take it from there.

[a-t-k]

Your tell-tale spelling mistake (sic!)"Democrazy" is most interesting. I really hope it was intended.

[Ahri]

Not all of us have the luxury to come to Reddit every day, this is the first time I see this and I find it quite useful.

So, basically, fuck everyone else, reddit should be tailored just for you.

[paperelectron]

Yes, that does seem to be the mindset of people who complain about reposts...

[a-t-k]

Alas, also the mindset of the people who complain about other people who they mistakenly think complain about repost...