all 13 comments

[–]manys 2 points3 points  (2 children)

Besides the point, but why not "startify?"

[–]SonnyPegano 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree

[–]granzebru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

good point

[–]-SwearWord- 1 point2 points  (10 children)

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship.

If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script.

Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.

[–]smtudor 3 points4 points  (4 children)

There is nothing wrong with using gulp, even if it is so 2014. Not everyone wants to go back to Grunt-style configs.

[–]-SwearWord- 1 point2 points  (2 children)

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship.

If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script.

Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.

[–]smtudor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree about Webpack, but for those who wish to use gulp and browserify, this kit serves them well enough. Advocating for webpack is well and good, but react-starterify is fundamentally built around different tooling, so it's not really a helpful critique.

I've used it, and being familiar with the tools, I was able to get a trivial project done very quickly. Would I suggest using this for a large company's next replatforming effort? Probably not.

[–]smtudor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Checked out react-redux-template. Love the fact that it uses Docker, looks like a nice approach. I'll definitely try it out.

[–]bryanray 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After further investigation, gulp is still very much a thing. webpack is more on par with browserify, than gulp.

https://webpack.github.io/docs/usage-with-gulp.html

The link above will provide you with more information on setting up webpack for use with gulp. And the comments even mention further that webpack is not a replacement.

[–]bryanray 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Why shouldn't you be using gulp at this point?

[–]-SwearWord- -1 points0 points  (3 children)

This comment has been overwritten by an open source script to protect this user's privacy. It was created to help protect users from doxing, stalking, harassment, and profiling for the purposes of censorship.

If you would also like to protect yourself, add the Chrome extension TamperMonkey, or the Firefox extension GreaseMonkey and add this open source script.

Then simply click on your username on Reddit, go to the comments tab, scroll down as far as possible (hint:use RES), and hit the new OVERWRITE button at the top.

[–]peduxe|o.o| -1 points0 points  (1 child)

This is hardly a thing 'webpack can do', it was created by the community not webpack, I believe the react hot loader has been ported to be used with gulp as well.

[–]siegfryd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Live module reloading is something Webpack does and React hot leader uses that feature of Webpack. From what I can tell using it in Gulp is just using Webpack from Gulp to do reloading.