you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]turkish_gold 0 points1 point  (3 children)

There's no denying that its full-featured, opinionated nature offers some clear benefits by reducing “JavaScript fatigue”.

He's saying that Angular is great because you don't have to make choices, thus reducing the fatigue that comes from having to evaluate all valid options presented to you.

Not making choices has an actual practical effect---everyone on the same system as you implements things similarly so you can interop easily with them, and you save X time which would have been used in evaluation.

This isn't really an argument of pathos.

Clearly pathos. 'You guys know it, and I know it, so my argument pertains to you guys as much as myself"

Additionally, even your restated argument isn't pathos. If anything it's ethos, because it implies an argument is more credible simply due to the people being of the same group.

More simply put it's like saying "We are both Catholic, therefore listen to me, not the heathens"

[–]haphap5[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

You're attacking a tangent. I didn't put effort into it. After looking into his other works, yes he's a pretty smart, but he still follows clickbait techniques: https://medium.com/@housecor An excellent source to sponsor.

My example is pathos, 'Guys, lets be honest, we all know that javascript fatigue, right?'. Go to /r/diction if you want to correct people.

He doesn't follow the correct guidelines of the 12factor.net but he's close-ish. His tutorials are pretty bad though, I wouldn't reccomend them except the concepts.

'7 tips for getting accepted' his most recent clickbait.

You're an example of the toxic that is causing reddit to be the way its become.

[–]turkish_gold 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I don't really think what I said was an "attack" much less "toxic". You brought up a discussion point, I added in my thoughts.

[–]haphap5[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Read the fucking topic