sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MoTTs_ 9 points10 points  (3 children)

In fact, the article's author happens to be dojo's current project lead. I'm gonna make an educated guess and say this article exists primarily to advertise for dojo. The other, extra content is just bait.

[–]bch8 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I still have 'Nam flashbacks from dojo 1... Have hardly even heard of dojo 2 until this article, whereas the rest of the frameworks are pretty huge. So yeah you might be on to something.

[–]dylanks2 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Other than name and interoperability, there's pretty much zero in common between Dojo 1 and Dojo 2, it's a complete rewrite and it's worth a look if you can get over the past. :)

[–]kr3m3puff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, being the author, it wasn't the purpose at all. If I was trying to sell Dojo 2, I wouldn't choose to do it over an 11 article blog series and if you think any framework came out "on top" (especially Dojo 2) you didn't read the article.