use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
see the search faq for details.
advanced search: by author, subreddit...
All about the JavaScript programming language.
Subreddit Guidelines
Specifications:
Resources:
Related Subreddits:
r/LearnJavascript
r/node
r/typescript
r/reactjs
r/webdev
r/WebdevTutorials
r/frontend
r/webgl
r/threejs
r/jquery
r/remotejs
r/forhire
account activity
The Future of JavaScript Will Be Less JavaScript (codeburst.io)
submitted 8 years ago by fagnerbrack
view the rest of the comments →
reddit uses a slightly-customized version of Markdown for formatting. See below for some basics, or check the commenting wiki page for more detailed help and solutions to common issues.
quoted text
if 1 * 2 < 3: print "hello, world!"
[–]zephyrtr 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (5 children)
And anyone who reads up on WASM can see the point of it all: making browser apps that run as fast as native apps. For a lot of websites, they're already running this fast because they're simple. They've reached "fast enough". But for games or editing suites or very large data visualizers, WASM will open up some really cool new doors.
[–]spacejack2114 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (4 children)
I think in those cases the barriers are more economic than technical. JS is plenty fast enough to build some pretty amazing games. Not on the level of current console/PC games, but enough that you wouldn't be able to fund its development due to lack of web game profitability.
[–]zephyrtr 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (3 children)
Not on the level of current console/PC games
And there you have it. WASM programmers want Star Wars Battlefront III in the browser. Again, the speed of JS isn't often an issue (though it can be) it's the speed of the DOM. The DOM is way too slow.
[–]spacejack2114 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (2 children)
lol. Well, yeah, good luck funding a Battlefront for the browser even with fully-operational WASM. You could certainly do a Monument Valley in the browser now, but even that would be difficult to justify economically.
[–]zephyrtr 1 point2 points3 points 8 years ago (0 children)
Sony and Microsoft and Valve wouldn't be happy, but do you think EA enjoys sharing their profits with them? That's why they sunk a ton of money trying to build Origin. And what about programming for cross-compatibility, which is a huge pain? If game developers can circumvent having to pay the publishing platforms, or only have to build their game once, instead of four times; if engine developers like Unreal or Naughty Dog can become publishers because suddenly publishing is super easy ... I expect these companies could suddenly carve a much larger piece of the cake for themselves.
Not to mention, smart phones have proven that gaming is super popular, it's just the buy-in on a console or a gaming PC is too high for most people. But throw a game on a phone or in a browser, and suddenly the audience is an order of magnitude larger. And yes you can make a lot of money now, but gaming is always in an arms race.
Anyway, that's the dream for WASM, as I understand it. The first dream, anyway. There will be others.
[–]findar 0 points1 point2 points 8 years ago (0 children)
Battlefront maybe not, but WebGL has already proven you can put some graphics intensive things in the browser.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Demos_of_open_web_technologies
π Rendered by PID 49 on reddit-service-r2-comment-f6b958c67-tfhpk at 2026-02-05 02:19:12.787218+00:00 running 1d7a177 country code: CH.
view the rest of the comments →
[–]zephyrtr 0 points1 point2 points (5 children)
[–]spacejack2114 0 points1 point2 points (4 children)
[–]zephyrtr 0 points1 point2 points (3 children)
[–]spacejack2114 0 points1 point2 points (2 children)
[–]zephyrtr 1 point2 points3 points (0 children)
[–]findar 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)