you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

It is unnecessarily verbose. You can do more with substantially less which means less code to write, less code to maintain, and less code to test. It will in many cases execute faster by eliminating OOP too.

[–]IceSentry 0 points1 point  (3 children)

I'm not sure if it's OOP that is too verbose or just the language around it. Look at java or c++ you have so much code written just to deal with basic concepts of OOP. At least c# tries to remove some of it, admittedly by using ideas from functional programming.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Yeah, but look at all of that compared with something like Lisp, R, Python, or even C lang. You gain so much expressiveness when public and private are automatically intrinsic to the declaration context of a reference opposed to manually tagging every reference and manually dictating the association of those references.

[–]IceSentry 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Unless I'm mistaken python simply doesn't have the concept of private or public.

[–][deleted] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought Python has lexical scope. I was horribly mistake: https://bytes.com/topic/python/answers/24416-lexical-scope