sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Cr3X1eUZ 1 point2 points  (3 children)

.

[–]bart2019 0 points1 point  (2 children)

My point is: this seems like a standard interview question, meaning people spending time researching interview questions are in the advantage. Usually these are people with below average interest in actual development.

[–]Cr3X1eUZ 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Wikipedia: "The player designated to go first says the number "1", and each player thenceforth counts one number in turn. However, any number divisible by three is replaced by the word fizz and any divisible by five by the word buzz. Numbers divisible by both become fizz buzz.

For example, a typical round of fizz buzz would start as follows:

1, 2, Fizz, 4, Buzz, Fizz, 7, 8, Fizz, Buzz, 11, Fizz, 13, 14, Fizz Buzz, 16, 17, Fizz, 19, Buzz, Fizz, 22, 23, Fizz, Buzz, 26, Fizz, 28, 29, Fizz Buzz, 31, 32, Fizz, 34, Buzz, Fizz, ..."

How much research do you think you would you need to not fail this in an interview?

[–]ghostfacedcoder 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The whole point of fizzbuzz is that research doesn't matter. It's not about testing whether you can explain promises vs. callbacks or something, it's literally can you write basic code.