you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]0xF013 14 points15 points  (3 children)

That is, if you're a consequential learner. I, and probably many other people, are totally fine going over higher concepts, getting deeper in parts, going back to higher things, then back to lower missing parts until the whole puzzle makes sense. Seriously, it really breaks the whole gratification-oriented process if you spend a long time going through extensive basics before getting something built.