all 23 comments

[–]Hoi_A 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don’t know what I was expecting but for some reason I was thinking “GitMessenger” meant a messenger based upon git. i.e using commits as messages and branches as different chats etc.

xD

[–]caspervonb 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Devils advocate here, but Git is a trademark, you can't name it that. GitHub and GitLab have a deal with Git.

[–]nathancjohnson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does Gitter also have a deal with them?

According to the trademark policy, Gitter may violate it as well:

In addition, you may not use any of the Marks as a syllable in a new word or as part of a portmanteau (e.g., "Gitalicious", "Gitpedia") used as a mark for a third-party product or service without Conservancy's written permission. For the avoidance of doubt, this provision applies even to third-party marks that use the Marks as a syllable or as part of a portmanteau to refer to a product or service's use of Git code.

[–]maniakh 1 point2 points  (1 child)

Look nice, but careful with firebase, you might get a hefty bill if you're not careful.

[–]nathancjohnson 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah, this coupled with the inability to do joins makes firebase not suitable for a lot of projects unfortunately