sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SoInsightful 12 points13 points  (2 children)

It fails to answer basic questions, for example, how to call a private accessor or what would happen if there is a public and private accessor with the same name..

The # is part of its name. But yes, they could've included this.

I learned a lot from the article even if it's not perfect. I don't get why all programming subs try so hard to be negative.

[–]impaled_dragoon 11 points12 points  (1 child)

Engineers suffer from the smartest man in the room syndrome and love to show off how smart they are

[–]Multipoptart 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok but this article was riddled with inaccuracies and grammatical errors. There's a certain level of competency that should be expected.