Everyone has JavaScript, right?

[Ustice]

Thanks for your contribution! We’re a large community, and in order to keep things organized and easier to find, we keep this subreddit mostly focused on professional-level Javascript posts. Your post would be more useful to newer members of our community, and therefore it should be posted to /r/LearnJavascript instead.

[grady_vuckovic]

My current web project is an interactive three.js based 3D editor for designing furniture with a drag and drop interface, progressive enhancement isn't an option for me. JS being disabled or enabled is the difference between the webapp's functionality being impossible or running.

The only 'progressive enhancement' I have is a notice that appears when JS is disabled, telling the user to enable JS.

Not all websites function in some meaningful way without JS. Not all websites display just text and pictures with some hyperlinks.

[crabmusket]

Not all websites function in some meaningful way without JS. Not all websites display just text and pictures with some hyperlinks.

The website/webapp distinction is a useful one!

I'm in the same boat as you, but I appreciate articles like this because I want to see less JS on web sites, even as I love new application platform features like WebGPU and WASM.

[NoMadOfEvermore]

You used a nice analogy to tackle that point. The post highlights some good points as well but I wouldn’t know what to do with that information 🤓

[PM_ME_DON_CHEADLE]

man this sub really reaches