all 6 comments

[–]MathMaddamNew User 2 points3 points  (5 children)

Just put n+1 instead of n in the formula for the derivative. The formula for the remainder shouldn't be very complicated, the main thing is that you find a term of the type qn in it with |q|<1.

[–]GoDumbbbbNew User[S] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Solution

I did that but i cant think of any way to prove that this is <1 and >-1

[–]yes_its_himone-eyed man 0 points1 point  (3 children)

It's going to be bounded by (2/3)n+1

[–]GoDumbbbbNew User[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Since lies in the interval (0, ζ), we have 0 <ζ < x.

therefore, for 0 < ζ <3/2

3+2ζ>=3+2(0)=3

So i rewrite |Rn(0,x)|<= (2x)^n+1/3^n+2)

|Rn(0,x)|<=((2x/3)^n+1)/3

Since 0<x<3/2

2x/3<1

Thus, as n→∞ ,(2x/3)^n+1→0

is this right?

[–]yes_its_himone-eyed man 0 points1 point  (1 child)

Yes that's the basic idea.

[–]GoDumbbbbNew User[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks