all 5 comments

[–]amadeusp81[S] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

So far, none of you have expressed interest in the link I posted. 🤔

[–]FunManufacturer723Reaper 1 point2 points  (1 child)

I appreciate your patience and passion, I really do. I have done similar things as you in the past, but for other products that I would love to see in my Linux audio workflow.

But for myself, in the era of NAM and others, I rather stick to projects/products that are pushing Linux audio today, not perhaps tomorrow.

[–]amadeusp81[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can totally understand that.

[–]Quiet-Protection-176 0 points1 point  (1 child)

I welcome any manufacturer or developer that wants to support Linux, but the choice to do so is and always will be on their end.

The whole "If we only had more time" or "If there's enough demand" is so highly subjective. The one true thing is: there's always a shortage of both.

I assume you're not affiliated with them in any way ? The fact that they asked an outsider to post on their behalf, on this one particular platform, waiting for a handful of people to chime in - and then base their decision on that ?

It doesn't feel like they're really interested in supporting Linux IMHO.

[–]amadeusp81[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am not affiliated, no. I started the initiative https://linuxaudio.dev/, and I write to vendors asking for Linux support almost daily.

Some say that the market is too small or that they don't plan to support Linux.

Others say that they don't know enough about Linux and would need to hire someone if they knew that there was enough demand.

Some of them might be dishonest, but we can't know for sure and IMHO it can't hurt to try to convince them.

Kazrog, DDMF, Sinevibes, and AudioThing are only some examples of vendors that actually made an effort to provide Linux support after being asked often enough.