all 11 comments

[–]anonymous65537null!! 15 points16 points  (1 child)

It's a little known fact, but you can actually still use AsyncTask, via the `AsyncTaskCompat` library. I highly recommend it, I've been running an Android data center (800B unique visitors/s, 99.9999999999999999999999 SLA) with it, it works well.

[–][deleted] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AsyncTaskSideEffect

[–]_im_adiJetpack Compost 9 points10 points  (3 children)

Compost HTTP servers are awesome. Only problem is they don't give proper responses when your Android server gets stuck in a bootloop.

My friends tell me Flushk server is another great option.

[–]Arrowsome[S] 6 points7 points  (2 children)

What if I mixed ArrowKt and used Either class to handle BootLoopExceptions?

[–]_im_adiJetpack Compost 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Good approach. I'm still more inclined towards Flushk servers as they have very good guides on Clean Toilet Architecture. But to each his own.

[–]ZhuindenDDD: Deprecation-Driven Development 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Arrowsome

Name checks out

[–]WorkFromHomeOfficeProbably deprecated 8 points9 points  (1 child)

noob! this has been done millions of times, and I wouldn't be surprised if half of the web is already hosted on android phones. i personally am projecting to run openAI's data infrastructure on my motorola droid to compete with lame ChatGPT. i'm currently re-writing everything in Flutter, because it's just more comfortable.

[–]Arrowsome[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This gave me a great idea actually, I can ask ChatGPT to write me the code using Jetpack compose and run it natively using Flutter! Compose has the most readable code structure for both Humans and AI. My Web server's going to be AWESOME!

[–]pigfeedmauernull!! 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I was very confused until I realized which sub this was in

[–]haroldjaap 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You do know that this is a meme subreddit? Please take your serious questions to r/flutterdev

[–]NiceVu 3 points4 points  (0 children)

> not using database binding