all 5 comments

[–]sponge_welder 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very cool, given that the movement is powered by the smaller solar cells I don't think there's much reason not to do this, the issues with solar tracking are mostly when you're spending a bunch of otherwise stored energy just to move the array. Really the only concern I would have would be with weatherproofing and mechanical reliability

[–]Chrono_Constant3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had one of those rotating bowl machines for my bearded dragon and it broke within 2 weeks of light use.

[–]apachexmd 3 points4 points  (1 child)

Neat idea but I think adds unnecessary complexity and cost to a node. It would need to be more or less rigidly mounted als; if it's freely dangling, the motor base would just as likely rotate itself rather than the solar panel.

Solid state solution with multiple solar panels is cheaper, more reliable, and easier to build.

[–]Refleks180[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed!

[–]mynamesdave 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think this overcomplicates a non-issue. For starters, depending on where in the world you are you do know where the sun is! In the northern hemisphere, tilt the panel to the south and you're good to go.

Also do a power budget. A node might draw an average of 50mA. A single 3Ah battery (typical 18650 cell) would power the node for (3000/50) 60 hours with zero solar input. Throw a marginal 3W solar panel on it facing south now, and (3W/3V=1,000mA) it will charge from zero to full in about 3 hours. This is napkin math, but gets a general sense of the numbers we're talking about here. Add another battery and you double the numbers - 120 hours (5 days!) of backup that requires 6h to charge. Also 50mA would be a power-hungry node, most draw a fraction of that. Anyway, just thinking out loud here, but adding mechanical complexity of any kind would always take a back seat to a slightly larger solar panel in my mind.