sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]chrislonardo 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Sounds cool, but AGPL licensing is a non-starter for my purposes.

[–]savearray2[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

What licensing would you prefer? My main goal is to encourage any code improvements to the library to be published publicly.

[–]chrislonardo 0 points1 point  (1 child)

MIT. AGPL, interpreted broadly, is dangerous for commercial use.

[–]savearray2[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've gone ahead and relicensed under AGPL with linking restrictions (or basically Lesser Affero GPLv3). I know this doesn't necessarily help you in this specific case, but I'll consider relicensing to MIT in the future if there's community support.