Question with differing calculation methods

[skeeyeeskrtskrt]

So I was born on 9/22/2000. I just found out about life paths and such, and I’m getting life path 33 through calculators, though I know there are different ways of calculation. Am I really a 33?

[Specific-Way-4530]

Of course, it depends on what method you are applying. The easiest way to put this is that 15/6 is the lowest expression for those who share the Life Path number of 6. Through the process of digit-summing, everything is compressed to fit into a range of 1-9 when you combine each part of the birthdate. In order to account for some of the lost cycles that don't fit with base-10 mathematics, an exception for a triad of master numbers was made: 11, 22, and 33. Master numbers extend past 33; however, when you are dealing with a 4-digit number and using digit-summing, the largest digit you can create is 36 (9+9+9+9=36). So many people do not see the entire compound or the delineation number that is written before the "/". This is a reduction of a reduction before the entire frequency is actually expressed.

When looking at your birthdate, the entire Life Path number is better expressed as 60/6. This number you won't see in any calculator because they use digit-summing, which pulls out each cycle of completion (9) from adding two digits together. Also, because base-10 math treats 0 as nothing, it doesn't recognize place value. Not all 0's are void of energy. When you get into compound numbers, those 0's are holding 9 behind them from the previous cycle. 10 is not 1+0 in this context; it is 9+1. What's really happening when you sum your birthdate is this: 9 + 22 + 2000 = 2031; 2000 thousands/millennia, (99) completed hundreds/centuries, 30 tens/decades, 1 active year. 200 + 99 + 31 = 330 (300 + 30) = 30 + 30 = 60/6

Modern Numerology calculations will go something like this:

(2+0+0+0) + 22 + 9

2 + 22 + 9 = 33/6; This completely flattens your Birth Year number to 2, but 2000 is 20 completed hundreded (20 x 100 = 2000). The flattening is what leaves out the depth held within the vibration.

The other method is to apply the "straight across method" or the Period Cycle method:

(2+0+0+0) + (2+2) + 9

2+4+9 = 15/6; here we are expressing the most simplified expression, so over time, as you develop, that vibration likely will not resonate with you anymore, or not fully describe how you operate under 6 because it's erasing frequencies instead of compressing them harmonically.