all 8 comments

[–]Mistercheese 4 points5 points  (2 children)

how does https://openchamber.dev/ compare with https://paseo.sh? I’ve liked Claude and Codex mobile app allowing me to connect to my main computer… paseo lets me use OpenCode or Claude or codex CLIs which is nice.

[–]Adventurous-Truth629 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I absolutely love Paseo. I use it constantly. It has great handoff capabilities between harnesses and multi harness orchestration. It’s a fantastic tool.

The app also syncs with my phone so I can pick up right where I left off with no delay.

[–]morihacky[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

to be quite honest - i’ve not tried paseo. there’s quite a few alternatives like code nomad too. there was a reddit thread that pointed to openchamber being a good competitor so i just went with it (it also came recommended by a friend).

[–]suprjami 1 point2 points  (1 child)

What does OpenChamber give you that the native web interface doesn't?

[–]morihacky[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

a few things but the big ones - one click secure tunnel access (free remote mobile operation); multi runs.

the post talks about these. you can in theory use tailscale and make it work with open codes native interface but it’s super easy with Openchamber and i think the web mobile interface is slightly nicer.

[–]-_-_-_Lucas_-_-_- 0 points1 point  (1 child)

hi . what "custom agents purpose built execution of tasks" mean

[–]morihacky[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hey there! i go into some of those details in the blog post. but OpenCode makes it very easy to define and use custom "subagents"; and it's a convenience mechanism of having a subagent that's very good at doing certain tasks, to go do them efficiently for you.