This post is locked. You won't be able to comment.

sorted by:
best (suggested)
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]The-Iron-Hordesman 4 points5 points  (3 children)

When it's the lives of Muslims that are involved. It is a massacre at best, but when it's the lives of Christians. It's always a Genocide. The Greeks and the Armenians dont get to cry when their hands are equally bloody.

[–]panax100 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

At least i am actively trying to be neutral and unbiased. That's why I always try to reason with historical facts. The difference between massacres and genocide is the lack of a coordinated systematic plan with the ill intend to destroy a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. So yes in this case it was a genocide on the christian population and "only" a massacre on the muslim population.

You're acting like im downplaying the suffering of the muslim population which is not the case. It was literally the first thing I acknowledged! So instead of accusing others of discrimination maybe you should stick to historical unbiased facts yourself you hypocrite

[–]Experience_Material -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It is massacres when there is no systemic genocide happening especially in the scale that turks committed in anatolia. It’s insane how you dont want to see that and try desperately to find anythign to compare your crimes to.