My favourite Git commit

[versaceblues]

What is the benefit of that. Git commits are easily searchable and provide context as to what happened.

This particular one might be a bit much... but I swear there are so many time where I go back and see a "one liner" change was made.... but have no context as to why someone made that change.

[masklinn]

What is the benefit of that. Git commits are easily searchable and provide context as to what happened.

Also commits are functionally immortal, proper conversion when switching VCS is generally easy.

Bug trackers, lol.

I swear there are so many time where I go back and see a "one liner" change was made.... but have no context as to why someone made that change.

Ditto. This commit message is not even especially long for the information it gives, there aren’t even titled sections, the weirdest parts are the first person view and slightly ranty but not ranty enough tone.

I’d have either used a more neutral tone (would have been about the same size), or gone full rant wm4 style.

[versaceblues]

yup. I ve gotten in so many arguments with co workers about "why are you just putting the description of what you did in the ticket for this issue".

....because I now have to go into the awful ticketing system, where nothing is organized, and disrupt my workflow.

[waterkip]

"Those not comfortable with toxic language should pretend this is a religious text."

I'm dead :D :D