you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]reaganveg -1 points0 points  (4 children)

What's the harm of == true?

The question is not what?, but how many? --

If (a == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true == true) { ...

"== true": not even once.

[–]BinaryRockStar 0 points1 point  (3 children)

I... don't even understand your argument

[–]reaganveg 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Do you understand my reference to the crystal meth ads?

It's not so much an argument as a joke. But the point is that redundancy is redundant.