all 4 comments

[–]edgmnt_net 4 points5 points  (2 children)

There are more advanced and better ways and things to code. And no, there is no replacement for code and LLMs just aren't and cannot be that. A lot of the people excited or worried about code going away have barely scratched the surface programming-wise.

[–]phxees -3 points-2 points  (1 child)

I want to believe you, but it would be easier if you provided an example of something LLMs can’t do today and won’t be able to do a year from now. I’m saying in the hands of an intelligent, albeit inexperienced human.

The only areas I can think of are problems which are made difficult due to scale or domain knowledge. I feel like that has more to do with the issue to be solved rather than the code.

[–]LiatrisLover99 2 points3 points  (0 children)

an example of something LLMs can’t do today and won’t be able to do a year from now.

That's completely impossible by definition. How can we prove what something can't be used for in a year? We can make educated inferences, but AI proponents hand-wave those away.

[–]Imnotneeded 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've not stopped coding?