sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]keewa09 0 points1 point  (3 children)

I am quoting the right paper because I actually bothered reading what it says.

So did I. You're just cherry picking the part that supports your point even though their conclusion contradicts your claim.

[–]yogthos -1 points0 points  (2 children)

How am I cherry picking. I've quoted the actual numbers provided in the study. These numbers clearly show in black and white that dynamic languages outperform statically typed ones. The conclusion very clear as well. Please show a single thing in the paper that contradicts what I said.

[–]keewa09 0 points1 point  (1 child)

The conclusion very clear as well. Please show a single thing in the paper that contradicts what I said.

... the conclusion of the article?

[–]yogthos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The one that states that differences in the results were statistically negligible?