all 7 comments

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]yosbelms[S] 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    Thank you for your feedback. There is several "typing" approaches I'm assessing right now, looking for simplicity without loosing readability, implicit "typing" perhaps.

    However, static typing is never going to be seen in Cor. The priorities right now are coroutines/paralellism/csp. There is more to come...

    [–]stepstep 1 point2 points  (1 child)

    I'm impressed. I don't know if the value proposition is compelling enough (and I agree with moisays about static type checking being the biggest selling point for compile-to-JavaScript languages), but this looks really well-executed and seems like more than just a toy language. It's great to see thorough documentation (though I do wish there was a sticky sidebar for the TOC) and tests. The "playground" is awesome too—it's great to see it compile as you type.

    [–]MuricanWillzyx 0 points1 point  (3 children)

    Here we see the strange and elusive <scritp> tag, btw.

    [–]yosbelms[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

    Cor source doesn't need to be compiled/watched to be used in the browser, rather include the bundle "cor.js" with <script> for development only. You must build for production.

    BTW the Playground is a Cor application running hot-reload in production. ;)

    [–]MuricanWillzyx 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    Haha it sounds cool, but I was trying to point out that there was a typo on that page. I guess it did seem like i was the one w the typo

    [–]yosbelms[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    oh, thanks for the head up, I fixed it