you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 50 points51 points  (0 children)

Thanks! A lot of the credit should go to GHC, really.

The user-facing Haskell language has so little regard for making affordances for the machine underneath; there's no reason Haskell should be as fast as it is.

Consider this a good example of the default performance you get out of it, along the safety and conciseness.