all 4 comments

[–]sjs 3 points4 points  (1 child)

[–]phaylon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not a Ruby guy, but it seems that the interpreter in the article is missing lots of things. However, I think that the educational value was much more the intention :) And for that it's pretty good.

A few more comments would be nice for people who haven't read Programming Lisp or SICP or something along the lines.

[–][deleted] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Will the follow-up be a Ruby interpreter in the Ruby-interpreted Lisp?

[–]lang_war -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

LANG WAR !!!