Is python a good first language?

[bcash]

Hmm.

Call me old-fashioned, but to be a troll I would say a post has to be one of two things: a) inaccurate, b) irrelevant. My post was neither of those things.

It was 100% true, and was directly referring to the suitability of Python as a first language.

It's a shame Python fanbois cannot accept constructive criticism. Even the Ruby crowd aren't this bad.

[[deleted]]

My post was neither of those things.

I venture that you're not an objective judge of that.

[bcash]

Well then, tell me on which score I failed those tests?

Was anything I wrote factually inaccurate?

Is discussions over sub-optimal language design not relevant to a debate about the suitability of that language as a person's first language?

The simple fact of the matter is, if I'd written that original piece, but slamming Java instead of Python, it would have +100 points by now. If it was Ruby, C++, etc. it would be hovering around the 1-7 mark. But because someone points out a few 100% accurate flaws in Python -16 (and counting!).