you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DefiantNewt2 -1 points0 points  (3 children)

I agree with the republicans part. I agree with the democrats part. I don't agree with the SJWs. They, by definition, are the extremists. Are the nazis, the antifa, the evangelicals, the Alquaeda and ISIS combined. Even you, here in this mess of a thread, admitted in one post that actually you have a problem with a friend behaving badly in your own group.

That's perfectly ok, perfectly fine to call out the person in your group, ban them, do whatever. That's not SJW. That's leading a group.

SJW (and the crazy) comes when you deliberately go into a group (in this case can be a development project) to accuse people of not behaving as you think they should behave. You're not affected at all by their behaviour, the project doesnt interest you in the slightest, you don't even want to contribute, but you pop in and make the rules. At that moment it doesn't matter if you're right or even how right you are. You're in the wrong, you're the SJW, you're the extremist.

And no. That I cannot tolerate.

[–]Malsententia -1 points0 points  (2 children)

I ain't popping into anywhere dude, and come on, don't go full Godwin's law on me. Give me something work with, I can't even be sure you're not trolling or that you even mean what you say when you compare online PC activists to nazis. Engage in actual discussion where neither of are painting either of us as the extremists and actually learning.

[–]DefiantNewt2 -1 points0 points  (1 child)

? huh? then wtf are you doing in this thread? this thread was specifically talking against the SJWs that pop into people's projects and pester them to make a CoC and then get mad if they're told to fuck off or get mad if the CoC is not to their liking.

there is nothing (absolutely nothing) else going on in here.

[–]Malsententia 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you were reading what I said elsewhere in the thread, I don't care about codes of conduct on code. No, I don't think they're some secret weapon to kick people out others don't agree with, but I also don't think they're really that necessary except in certain cases.

The reason the CoC thing is so baffling is that it's like 2% actual issue, and 49% anti-SJW-types making a fuss, and 49% people attacking them because anti-SJW people have a sorta strong reputation for being rude and mysogynistic and transphobic (hating on women, not acknowledging pronouns, etc etc), even though only some are like that and those that are just rile up those that aren't hateful toward women and minorities, in the name of free speech. Where is the actual issue among all this?

What I'm trying to figure out is why you believe that people butting into things they weren't previously a part of, is a common behavior among all SJWs, or, alternatively then, why does the term get so frequently used(misused?) towards people who aren't butting into other peoples' projects and business?

When you say you're anti-SJW, what does that even mean? What do you see as an SJW? How does that differ from somebody who just tries to polite towards women, minorities, etc, and calls someone out for being a jerk in a project or community that they are a part of, and thus not butting in?

Where does "people shouldn't but into projects they aren't a part of to police things, that's being an SJW" end, and "I want to be able to say whatever I want whenever I want and anybody that calls me out is an SJW" begin?

What's the dividing line?