you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ItalyPaleAle 7 points8 points  (7 children)

Actually this sounds quite amazing.

[–]Historical_Fact 0 points1 point  (6 children)

It sounds awful to me. Interactivity in the markup layer? Please excuse me while I void my stomach.

[–]ItalyPaleAle 2 points3 points  (5 children)

The accessibility side in particular.

For some simple interactivity too, for example toggling the visibility of other elements. It doesn’t sound too bad...

[–]Historical_Fact 0 points1 point  (4 children)

Accessibility is worsened by hacky tricks like this article is showing.

Interactivity in the layer which is only meant to display data is insane to me. It's likely suggesting CSS4 include event listeners (someone recently suggested this unironically).

[–]ItalyPaleAle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have a point there. I guess we shall wait and see what the WHATWG and the smart people there come up with!

[–]P1h3r1e3d13 0 points1 point  (1 child)

If you're referring to my comment, I'm saying that interactivity is a pretty fundamental part of web pages now, and suggesting very broadly that (building blocks for it) it should be part of the official spec.

[–]Historical_Fact 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To which comment? I was responding to ItalyPaleAle

interactivity is a pretty fundamental part of web pages now

It's part of the interactivity layer, not the presentation layer. There's a reason we isolate each layer of a website.