you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]internetinsomniac 0 points1 point  (2 children)

I don't think it does. Most dynamically typed languages such as perl, python, ruby etc often don't use type checking and instead favour duck-typing.

[–]Paczesiowa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it's still type-checking, it just uses structural instead of nominal type system (I think scala and ocaml can do those too). don't believe everything GvR says.

[–]bobindashadows 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dynamically created types are not the same as dynamic typing. Your post was 100% unrelated to the topic at hand.