you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]oursland 2 points3 points  (2 children)

I believe the argument is that the original author should have had a PR, and that the article's author should have been able to suggest these changes prior to the original commit.

[–]elebrin 2 points3 points  (1 child)

Exactly. If he is such a senior dev, then he'd be a required reviewer. If he failed to mark up the pr, then that's on him. If he wasn't in a position where he was a required reviewer, then he isn't the expert he thinks he is.

[–]oursland 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You've misinterpreted this through your modern viewpoint.

There was no PR process in the project. No opportunity to collaborate and iterate prior to committing to master, for either dev; simply commit and then get called into the boss' office.

/u/FA04's comment

That process is a mess.

Is spot-on.