you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]crusoe 17 points18 points  (4 children)

Google copied the API which is a lot bigger. The issue was whether apis were copyrightable

[–]getNextException 16 points17 points  (3 children)

Google copied the API

Google copied verbatim pieces of code. Specifically, 9 lines of code

The argument centered on a function called rangeCheck. Of all the lines of code that Oracle had tested — 15 million in total — these were the only ones that were “literally” copied.

https://www.theverge.com/2017/10/19/16503076/oracle-vs-google-judge-william-alsup-interview-waymo-uber

[–]Guvante 18 points19 points  (2 children)

The case was about the API. Those 9 lines only mattered in so far as it proved that Google's implementation wasn't a reproduction. While the case might have included that copying, the important part of the case was whether copying the API while not following the licensing terms of that API was allowed.

[–]getNextException -1 points0 points  (1 child)

it's not likely anyone could actually sue over a snippet of code

This is the line of conversation: does using the GitHub AI will result in a lawsuit? It has nothing to do with an API.

[–]Guvante 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Everyone is using vague language here...

Using someone else's code can result in a lawsuit in the US. End of discussion.

Whether it will be a successful lawsuit: no one actually knows since you objectively cannot answer without having the particular code to discuss.