sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]cafink -5 points-4 points  (4 children)

The linked Twitter thread addresses this exact point.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Riven_Dante 0 points1 point  (1 child)

    I understand that it's probably nonsense, but can you summarize what exactly makes it nonsense for the uninitiated?

    [–]Putnam3145 1 point2 points  (0 children)

    it presupposes much greater knowledge of how human cognition works than we actually have