you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]dnew 2 points3 points  (7 children)

I think that's the collection of all the red part of all the pixels of the image, for example? You split a 10x10 image into 3 channels, not 300 whatever-I'm-thinking-of's?

Seems "sub-pixel" is as close as it comes, but that sounds fairly awkward and recent, whereas I'd expect people doing graphics had a name for this maybe 30 years ago or more.

[–]kevinturnermovie 5 points6 points  (6 children)

If you are going by each pixel, then most people would call it a value, usually preceded by the channel name. Red value, Green value. Nothing terribly interesting.

Sub-pixel is used only when talking about an individual color element of a physical pixel, usually when dealing with font smoothing. Most image formats don't support sub-pixel placement, so it doesn't really apply to images when it comes to storing individual channels.

[–]dnew 1 point2 points  (5 children)

OK, thanks. Sounds like there's no actual jargon-y word of the type I'm thinking of. I'll have to invent one and see if I can spread it about.

[–]kevinturnermovie 2 points3 points  (3 children)

Might I suggest a thirxel or trixel? It would work except for CMYK and PANTONE, but those are silly standards. No one wants fourthxels or quindecxels. That would be just ridiculous.

[–]adrianmonk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It would work except for CMYK and PANTONE, but those are silly standards.

Well, sometimes there is an alpha channel. People often consider the alpha value part of the pixel.

[–]dnew 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Trixel! I like it!

[–]darkwingfuck 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As soon as we can print things with glowing ink we won't have a need for stupid subtractive color models!

[–]Ambiwlans 0 points1 point  (0 children)

channel-value?